Radical acceptance is a transformative skill we teach in our San Francisco Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) skills group.

If you just so happen to have my skills training book, when you get up to go get paper, go get your skills training manual. If you don't have the manual but you've got the handouts, well go get your handouts. And there are two pages. On the first page you're going to have Radical Acceptance, Turning the Mind. We're going to be going over.

Therapy is usually focused on change. And of course, you will work on change in therapy. But sometimes there are things in life we can’t change, or can’t immediately change. Sometimes we need to accept what feels unacceptable to lessen our suffering and figure out how to move forward.

Part 1 of this series on radical acceptance explores the concept of radical acceptance.

This post explores how to radically accept. Because understanding the concept is one thing, doing it is another.

How to practice Radical Acceptance

  1. Please download these files or print them. I will be removing these links after the lesson is complete. Please do not share these links; They may be purchased in the.
  2. Here is a significant book, Four Days to Change, by Michael Welp, that every woman needs to read and share with men. The subtitle explains the prize you receive: 12 Radical Habits to Overcome Bias and Thrive in a Diverse World. Welp takes us through his early journey as a white man to address his own “don’t have a clue” mindset.
  3. Radically Open Dialectical Behavior Therapy (RO DBT) is a new evidence based treatment, supported by 20 years of clinical research, targeting a spectrum of disorders characterized by excessive self control, often referred to as overcontrol (OC).

1. Notice that you are fighting reality

The first step towards radical acceptance is awareness that you are resisting reality. Sometimes this is obvious, but other times it’s subtler.

Clues that you might be fighting reality:

  • Feeling bitter or resentful
  • Thinking your life shouldn’t be this way
  • Regularly unhappy or frustrated with life
  • Thinking that if X just changed, you would be happy
  • Trying to force other people to change their behaviors

2. Turn your mind towards acceptance

Once you’ve recognized that you are resisting some truth in your life, the next step is to turn your mind toward acceptance.

‘Turning the mind’ is a DBT skill that supports radical acceptance by helping you turn away from resisting reality and turn towards acceptance.

You don’t have to go from resistance to acceptance – often that’s too big a leap. But you can make an internal commitment to stop fighting what is.

Turning the mind is about choosing to radically accept, which is often the precursor to acceptance. It is becoming willing to accept.

3. Use your body to help you

When you are fighting reality, your body may be tense. It’s not uncommon to tense the muscles of the shoulders, face or stomach when you’re resisting something. Tight muscles work against relaxing into acceptance.

Hex file for starsat 2000 hd software

Two other DBT skills help your body relax and open

The first one is called Willing Hands.
While sitting, relax all the muscles in your arms and then turn your palms facing upwards, resting them on your lap. Notice if that shifts anything in your body.

The second one is called Half-smile.
Making sure your face muscles are relaxed, turn the corner of your mouth up slightly. Notice how that feels and if that moves you towards acceptance.

4. Act as if

211 Radical Acceptancedialectical Behavioral Training

Even if you’re not able to radically accept, try acting as if. If you did radically accept, what would you do differently? How might you feel?

Common Objections to Radical Acceptance

If I radically accept something, it means I’m giving up
When you practice radical acceptance, it does not mean that you stop working on things you want to change. It’s not about passivity. But the only way to work effectively towards change is by fully and completely accepting what is.

Radical acceptance is saying that whatever bad things happened to me are ok
Practicing radical acceptance does not equal approval, forgiveness or even compassion.

Radical acceptance is a process
Usually, radical acceptance is not one-and-done.

Radically accepting that it’s raining outside when you planned to go on a hike isn’t too challenging. You can probably accept it, feel disappointed and move on.

If you’re working on radical acceptance of something very painful, though, you will probably have to radically accept over and over.

For example:
If you lost someone you love, or are dealing with a chronic illness, it’s normal to go in and out of acceptance. Each time you notice that you’re fighting reality, remind yourself you’re not doing anything wrong and gently shift your focus towards full acceptance. Let whatever emotions arise move through you.

This is the path to freedom and peace.

Wondering how practicing radical acceptance can help you?

Call (415) 310-5142 to get started with therapy in San Francisco. We offer individual therapy, couples therapy and adherent DBT.

← Radical Acceptance: A life-changing DBT skillWhat Happens in Couples Therapy →
doi: 10.1007/BF03392606
PMID: 22478129
211

211 Radical Acceptancedialectical Behavioral Training Post Test

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Behavior analysts have been called mechanists, and behavior analysis is said to be mechanistic; that is, they are claimed to be aligned with the philosophy of mechanism. What this means is analyzed by (a) examining standard and specialized dictionary and encyclopedia definitions and descriptions of mechanism and its cognates and (b) reviewing contemporary representations of the mechanistic worldview in the literature on the philosophy of psychology. Although the term mechanism and its cognates are sometimes an honorific (e.g., “natural science”), their standard meanings, usages, and functions in society, science, psychology, and philosophy do not aptly characterize the discipline. These terms mischaracterize how behavior analysts conceptualize (a) the behavior of their subjects and the individuals with whom they work and (b) their own behavior as scientists. Discussion is interwoven throughout about the nature of terms and definitions in science.

Full text

Dialectical Behavioral Therapy Dbt Techniques

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (3.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Baum William M. Definition in behavioral science: a review of B. B. Wolman's Dictionary of behavioral science. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):445–451.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Bowers KS. Situationism in psychology: an analysis and a critique. Psychol Rev. 1973 Sep;80(5):307–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Branch MN. On the role of 'memory' in the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):171–179.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carr EG, Durand VM. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):111–126.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Catania AC. Speaking of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep;52(2):193–196.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Catania AC. The gifts of culture and of eloquence: An open letter to Michael J. Mahoney in reply to his article, 'Scientific psychology and radical behaviorism'. Behav Anal. 1991 Spring;14(1):61–72.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chiesa M. Radical behaviorism and scientific frameworks. From mechanistic to relational accounts. Am Psychol. 1992 Nov;47(11):1287–1299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Donnell TV, Welford B, Coleman ED. Potroom asthma: New Zealand experience and follow-up. Am J Ind Med. 1989;15(1):43–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Day Willard F. On certain similarities between the Philosophical investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the operationism of B. F. Skinner. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):489–506.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Donahoe John W, Palmer David C. The interpretation of complex human behavior: Some reactions to Parallel Distributed Processing, edited by J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, and the PDP Research Group. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):399–416.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Ferster CB. Is operant conditioning getting bored with behavior? A review of Honig and Staddon's Handbook of Operant Behavior? J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):347–349.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Hayes SC, Brownstein AJ. Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. Behav Anal. 1986 Fall;9(2):175–190.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hayes SC, Hayes LJ, Reese HW. Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper's World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):97–111.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hineline PN. When we speak of knowing. Behav Anal. 1983 Fall;6(2):183–186.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hineline PN. Can a statement in cognitive terms be a behavior-analytic interpretation? Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;7(2):97–100.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hineline PN. A self-interpretive behavior analysis. Am Psychol. 1992 Nov;47(11):1274–1286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hinson John M. Seeking the natural lines of fracture: A review of Thompson and Zeiler's Analysis and Integration of Behavioral Units. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):133–144.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Logue AW. A behaviorist's biologist: Review of Philip J. Pauly's controlling life: Jacques Loeb and the engineering ideal in biology. Behav Anal. 1988 Fall;11(2):205–207.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • MacCorquodale K. B. F. Skinner's verbal behavior: a retrospective appreciation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):831–841.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marr J. Determinism. Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;5(2):205–207.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marr M Jackson. `Tis the gift to be simple: A retrospective appreciation of Mach's The Science of Mechanics. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):129–138.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149–155.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moore Jay. On the tactful specification of meaning: A review of Harré and Lamb's The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychology. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):387–395.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Moore J. Some historical and conceptual relations among logical positivism, operationism, and behaviorism. Behav Anal. 1985 Spring;8(1):53–63.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morris Edward K. Questioning psychology's mechanism: A review of Costall and Still's cognitive psychology in question. Behav Anal. 1989 Spring;12(1):59–67.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Morris EK. ABA presidential address: the aim, progress, and evolution of behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;15(1):3–29.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moxley R. Three conceptual units for behavior. Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;10(1):17–26.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moxley RA. From mechanistic to functional behaviorism. Am Psychol. 1992 Nov;47(11):1300–1311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Neuringer A. Humble behaviorism. Behav Anal. 1991 Spring;14(1):1–13.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer DC, Donahoe JW. Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. Am Psychol. 1992 Nov;47(11):1344–1358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SKINNER BF. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SKINNER BF. Behaviorism at fifty. Science. 1963 May 31;140(3570):951–958. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Skinner BF. What is the experimental analysis of behavior? J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):213–218.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson Travis. The examining magistrate for nature: A retrospective review of Claude Bernard's An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):211–216.[PMC free article][Google Scholar]
  • Todd JT, Morris EK. Case histories in the great power of steady misrepresentation. Am Psychol. 1992 Nov;47(11):1441–1453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wanchisen BA. Forgetting the lessons of history. Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;13(1):31–37.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams JL. The behavioral and the mystical: Reflections on behaviorism and eastern thought. Behav Anal. 1986 Fall;9(2):167–173.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International
Coments are closed
Scroll to top